MENTAL HEALTH IN THE HEART OF MAUN

Survivor guilt appears when a person remains alive after a death, a tragedy, or a loss, and begins to wonder why they are still here while others are not. It can emerge after accidents, illnesses, wars, disasters, suicides, violence, migration, traumatic grief, or situations in which someone close died and they did not. This guilt does not always come from a real mistake. Many times, it comes from the painful contrast between one’s own life and the absence of the other person. The person may feel that continuing to breathe, smile, rest, or have a future becomes strange, unfair, or even offensive in front of the one who is no longer here. That is why survivor guilt needs to be approached with great care. It is not just an irrational thought, but a deep moral and emotional wound. The person does not always accuse themselves of something they did wrong, but of something much harder to accept: they are still alive, and that feels heavy. WHY AM I STILL ALIVE? One of the most painful questio...

There is a particularly painful form of guilt: the guilt of someone who feels they could not save another person. It may appear after a death, an illness, an accident, an emotional crisis, a loss, or a serious situation in which the person believes they should have done more. This guilt often rests on cruel questions: “What if I had been there?”, “What if I had called earlier?”, “What if I had known?”, “What if I had acted differently?”. Sometimes these questions help us review real facts, but at other times they become a trap that accuses the person of not having done the impossible. Not every death, illness, or suffering means that someone failed. There are situations where there was no warning, no access, no time, no resources, or no real opportunity to intervene. In those cases, the loss hurts deeply, but the pain should not automatically become guilt. WHEN A PERSON ACCUSES THEMSELVES FOR NOT DOING THE IMPOSSIBLE Many people accuse themselves of not preventing something that was no...